Methodology for determining the residual value of the car. Documents establishing the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the object of assessment

5.4. Methods for estimating the cost of vehicles.

Professional appraisers in their practical work to determine the value of movable property, they are guided by document No. RD 37.009 developed by the State Scientific Center "NAMI" jointly with the Federal Center for Forensic Expertise and agreed with the Ministry of Justice and the State Customs Committee of the Russian Federation. 015 - 98 "Methodological guide to determining the cost of a car Vehicle taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation. Taking into account the requirements of the Law "On appraisal activities in the Russian Federation" in 1999, and then in 2000. some technical changes have been made to the methodology for calculating the cost of cars and trucks, trailers for them, buses, motor vehicles of domestic and foreign production, which contribute to a more objective determination of the value of the appraised object. The results of the calculations made on the basis of these methodological recommendations make it possible to determine with a sufficient degree of accuracy the residual value of the objects being valued, which is used in determining the sale or lease price, the starting price for an auction, privatization or transfer to trust management, mortgage transactions and the resolution of property disputes , accrual of the taxable base and other production situations.

The procedure for assessing the value of a vehicle includes the following operations.

1. Drawing up a contract for work to determine the cost of the vehicle. This is an important stage of work, which involves getting to know the customer, determining his authority to order appraisal work, preliminary tactful clarification of possibly hidden defects and damage to the appraisal object. After notifying the customer of existing market prices for this kind of work and obtaining consent for their implementation on the presented object, an appropriate contract is concluded, which necessarily fixes the subject of the contract, the obligations, rights and responsibilities of the parties, the cost of services and the date of determining the value of the appraisal object.

2. Vehicle inspection.

This stage of performance of valuation services includes several operations. First of all, the appraiser fixes: firstly, information about the owner of the vehicle or his authorized representative (passport data of a person or details of a legal entity); secondly, the availability of a technical passport (certificate of registration) and the main parameters of the technical means; thirdly, the content of the document of the internal affairs body, which recorded the damage to the assessed object, discovered during its inspection at the scene. Then the appraiser proceeds to a direct inspection and determination of the technical condition and completeness of the movable property. The inspection act is not a mandatory document, but it greatly simplifies the process of compiling a report, as well as its study by interested parties, which in turn allows you to avoid a large number of unnecessary questions, and therefore increases the degree of trust in its compiler.

3. Identification of the data of the technical passport of the vehicle. The passport data of the presented technical means characterize the object of assessment in terms of such indicators as the year of manufacture, body and engine numbers, mileage and other parameters. For most technical equipment, the year of manufacture is set by the body number, since in connection with the introduction of the VIN in the passport data, the international identification number of the technical equipment, according to ISO-8 standards, a unified international road transport numbering system is used. VIN - number is a combination of 17 numbers and letters, consisting of three parts and individual for each car.

The first part of the number, consisting of three characters, means the manufacturer's international codes: geographical area, country, manufacturing plant. The second part consists of six characters and indicates the vehicle model. The third part consists of eight characters: the first is a Latin letter indicating the year of manufacture, and the rest are the serial number of the body.

Thus, being able to decipher the body number, the appraiser can reliably establish the features of the vehicle, and sometimes the legality of its origin and the authenticity of the document. The engine number contains information about the model, displacement and serial number of this unit. An important pricing factor in determining the residual value of a vehicle is its mileage.

To establish the reality of the run, the appraiser must make sure that the seals on the speedometer are intact and that there are no signs of opening. Reliable mileage information is usually contained in vehicle service books and computer databases of service stations.

A sufficiently accurate indicator in doubtful situations can be the condition of the interior, body, engine, wear of brake discs and drums, and other parts of the object of evaluation. With the same care, the appraiser checks the availability and technical condition of the vehicle's units available for inspection.

At the end external examination and making appropriate records, the evaluator, if possible, starts the vehicle engine and checks its operation over the entire range of crankshaft speeds, as well as the operation of other components, systems and control devices. The operation of the engine is checked in order to detect extraneous noise (knocking), excessive smoke through the exhaust pipe and the oil fill hole.

4. Carrying out settlement operations to determine the value of the vehicle. The most time-consuming step in the provision of services for assessing the value of movable property is the conduct of settlement operations. In accordance with the generally accepted methodology for assessing the cost of a vehicle, all calculations are made in the following sequence.

4.1. Retail prices (R) set by the manufacturer for vehicles that are similar to the object presented for assessment are specified as of the assessment date. Information base for these purposes, the prices of regional dealers can serve; regularly published collections of the State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation "NAMI"; data of the DAT and SCHWACKE catalog systems, which update their database quite often and contain almost any necessary information on prices for vehicles, spare parts for them, standards for the maintenance and repair of equipment. A certificate-invoice, check or other document issued by a trading organization that sells used vehicles, as well as issued when purchasing a vehicle at an auction, exchange auction, etc., cannot be used as the initial price when determining the residual value object.

4.2. The retail price of the vehicle presented for evaluation is specified, taking into account its completeness. So, for example, with non-standard completeness of the object of assessment, its price decreases (or increases) by the value of the cost of the missing (or additional) element and the cost of its installation. Depending on what in the formula (5.42) signs (+) or (-) are put:

- retail price, taking into account the completeness of the vehicle, rub.,

Retail price of a standard vehicle, rub.

The price of components and the cost of their installation on the vehicle, rub.

When assigning the initial price of a domestic vehicle that has been discontinued, you can use the conversion factors to the prices of the basic models of new vehicles, which are recommended in methodological guide No. RD 37.009.015-98.

To set the initial price when evaluating a foreign vehicle that has been discontinued, or there is no reliable information about its retail price, you can use the prices of either this object in the last year of production, or the next technical parameters analogue.

4.3. The estimated percentage of depreciation of the vehicle presented for evaluation is determined.

The starting point for subsequent calculations of the residual value of the vehicle is the estimated percentage of wear (Wt), which is determined by the formula:

Wear indicator by mileage (in% per 1000 km of run, see No. RD 37.009.015-98),

Actual mileage on the day of inspection (in thousand km, accurate to one decimal place) from the beginning of operation or after major repairs,

Aging indicator by time factor (in % per year) depending on the intensity of operation (see No. RD 37.009.015-98

Actual service life (in years, with an accuracy of one decimal place) from the beginning of operation or after major repairs.

The percentage of wear (Wtr) can be determined by the wear of individual units and expensive components, if the vehicle presented for evaluation during its operation was made and documented or actually confirmed by their replacement. Confirmation of the improvements made may be an entry in the data sheet, a paid order from a car service company, a marking of the manufacturer's date of manufacture of the product, etc. Expensive components include units and assemblies, the cost of which exceeds 3% of the cost of the vehicle.

The individual percentage of wear of replaced units and components is calculated similarly to the percentage of wear of the vehicle itself, only the indicator (Df) and (Pf) correspond to the time of their operation. For example, if an engine was replaced on a five-year-old car two years ago, then the indicator (Df) for it will be equal to two years. At the same time, when identifying the fact of replacing the unit, it matters which units are used as a substitute - new or overhauled; similar, standard or interchangeable with other models (modifications); more expensive or cheaper. All this information will be required when adjusting the residual value of the technical equipment being assessed.

Practice shows that when determining the wear of a unit that has been overhauled and installed on a vehicle, an additional 20% allowance is added to the percentage of wear obtained by calculation, taking into account the reduction in the life of the unit after a major overhaul. The appraiser needs to keep in mind what is meant by a major overhaul. This repair includes the replacement of the base part of the unit, for example, for the engine - the replacement of the cylinder block; for a car body - its base; for a passenger car (bus) as a whole - replacement of the body; for a truck – frame replacement, etc. below (excluding the replacement of the body assembly).

In this case, the appraiser must justify the decrease in the calculated percentage of wear by the presence of a document confirming the repair work performed.

4.4. The residual value of the vehicle presented for evaluation is determined, taking into account the estimated percentage of its wear and tear.

If there are no documented replacements of individual units and expensive parts in the object of assessment, then its residual value (Siz), taking into account the estimated percentage of wear, is determined by the formula:

(5.45)

Estimated retail price of the vehicle, taking into account its completeness, (rub.),

The value of the reduction in the cost of a vehicle due to its natural wear and tear, (rubles). The reduction value can be calculated using the formula:

(5.46)

Vehicle retail price

- the estimated percentage of vehicle wear (see formula 5.44)

When determining the residual value of an overhauled vehicle, its estimated price, as noted above, should be reduced by 20%.

If, during the operation of the object of assessment, individual units and expensive components were replaced, then their individual percentage of natural wear and tear should be determined and taken into account when calculating the residual value of the vehicle. In these cases, use the formula:

(5.47)

The residual value of the vehicle, taking into account the estimated wear and tear and replacement during operation of individual units and expensive components, rub.

Costs (taking into account the cost of work) for the replacement of the i-th unit (product) made during operation, rub.

Estimated depreciation of the vehicle, taking into account the completeness, rub.,

The percentage of wear of the i-th unit (product) replaced during operation,

Number of units (products) replaced during operation, units,

In turn, the cost of replacing the i-th unit (product) can be determined by the formula:

The price of the i-th unit (component item) replaced during operation, rub.,

Cost of work to replace the i-th unit (component item), rub.

There is another option for calculating the cost of units and expensive components installed on a vehicle during operation. It can also be carried out separately, but according to formulas (5.45 and 5.46), adding their residual value to the residual value of the vehicle itself, but in this case, the cost of a separately calculated unit (product) should be excluded from the estimated price of the vehicle, that is, the residual value should be determined like an incomplete vehicle.

4.5. The cost of defects in the operation of the evaluated vehicle is determined.

If defects in the operation of the appraised object are detected, caused by abnormal storage conditions, use, improper maintenance and other factors, the residual value of the vehicle is reduced by an amount (V d.e.) close to the cost of eliminating the identified defects, including the proposed replacement of units, assemblies and parts , i.e

The cost of eliminating existing operational defects, rub.,

The cost of eliminating existing operating defects, taking into account the renewal factor, rub.

Approximate calculations are justified by the fact that when determining the residual value of a vehicle in order to draw up documents for inheritance, donation, etc. defects are identified not for the preparation of a calculation and the corresponding repair, but only for the most complete picture of the technical condition of the vehicle and the reflection of this condition in the amount of the residual value. As a rule, appraisers refer to defects in operation:

traces and consequences of corrosion;

fatigue cracks in body elements, frames and other parts;

chips (potholes), tarnishing (loss of gloss), delamination, cracking, stretching of non-metallic parts (materials), paintwork and other protective coatings, upholstery tearing;

pollution, rupture (not along the seam) of the upholstery, awning;

traces of straightening, straightening, fitting, repair welding of body elements, frames;

bumps, dents and other mechanical damage caused by violation of the rules of operation (and not a consequence of a traffic accident);

weakening of fastening of aggregates, units of the vehicle;

leakage of tanks and systems, other obvious operating defects.

Some of the operating defects listed above may be the result of not only improper maintenance, but also partly the result of natural aging (wear and tear) of the materials used in the construction. Therefore, when determining the magnitude of the reduction in the residual value of the vehicle and the presence of operating defects (Vd.e.), the appraiser subtracts the part of the costs that, in his opinion, falls on natural wear and tear from the amount of costs for eliminating operating defects. Therefore, the elimination of defects, taking into account natural wear and tear, can be determined by the formula:

(5.50)

The total cost of work to eliminate operational defects, rub.,

The total cost of materials needed to eliminate operational defects, rub.,

The total cost of spare parts required to eliminate operational defects, rub.,

Renewal coefficient, which takes into account in the cost of eliminating defects the part that falls on the elimination of the consequences of natural wear and tear, rub.

If, according to the appraiser, some of the identified defects are completely dependent on the quality of vehicle maintenance, then the funds for eliminating these defects can only be determined by summing up the cost of work, the price of materials and the cost of the parts and components themselves:

(5.51)

If defects in the operation of the vehicle are detected, which can only be eliminated by replacing the part - pollution, tarnishing of coatings, etc. (these works, as a rule, are not provided for by the manufacturer), the appraiser, using collections of normative labor intensity and technological processes, other information, takes the estimated labor intensity of the work and the corresponding cost of a standard hour as the basis for the calculation, or uses already normalized similar work performed, previously estimated or for other types of vehicles. The current valuation practice is such that when determining the cost of a vehicle, the renewal factor used in formula (5.50) is taken into account only for those objects whose overall level of wear is at least 40%.

4.6. The cost of the vehicle is adjusted if the object is presented for inspection in an unrepaired condition.

When inspecting a damaged vehicle in an unrepaired condition, the appraiser reduces the pre-accident residual value (Cd.e.) by the amount of restoration costs, taking into account possible renewal (Cd.e.) and by the amount of the expected loss of commodity value that will occur as a result of restoration (Pr.) , that is, it makes some adjustment to its residual value (Sav):

The amount of costs for the elimination of a specific accidental damage and the amount of compensation for damages may not coincide, since the existing methodological recommendations (No. RD37.009.015-98) take into account the partial renewal of a used vehicle when replacing damaged parts with new ones. The imperfection of the repair technology is compensated by the amount obtained when calculating the value of the loss of commodity value that occurred as a result of an accident and subsequent repair effects. Depending on the goals and objectives of the assessment, the costs of restoration, taking into account the possible renewal (Zd.e.) and the amount of loss of commercial value (Vr) of the vehicle, can be calculated separately as independent services.

4.7. The residual value of the vehicle is adjusted if the object is presented for inspection after restoration work following the accident.

In such situations, the appraiser determines the residual value of the vehicle using formulas (5.43–5.46), where the identified traces of repair impacts are considered as operating defects. Sometimes, as an exception, at the request of interested organizations and in the presence of official documents disclosing the methods, types and cost of restoration work for a particular accident, the appraiser may attempt to determine the technical condition of the vehicle before the accident and calculate its pre-accident residual value using formulas 5.45 - 5.48 , followed by correction of the result according to formula (5.51). In this case, it is necessary to warn the customer about possible inaccuracies in the calculation.

4.8. The value of the loss of commodity value (UTS) of the evaluated vehicle is determined.

The TCB of a vehicle is usually determined in its damaged form (for example, after an accident and before recovery). This condition can be characterized by premature deterioration of the presentation of the object of evaluation, a decrease in the strength and durability of individual parts, assemblies and assemblies due to frequent repairs, the use of used or repaired spare parts during repair work. The appraiser determines the total value of the reduction in the cost (Vob) of the vehicle due to the loss of the presentation according to the formula:

The cost of repairing removable body parts,

The cost of repairing non-removable body elements that form the body frame or eliminating the distortion of the vehicle's load-bearing parts,

The cost of full or partial painting of the body (cabin, frame, cargo platform),

The cost of replacing the body (cabin, frame) of the vehicle or dismantling them with a large amount of fitting and fitting work, causing a violation of the quality of the factory assembly.

Appraisers do not take into account TCB if vehicles on the day of inspection either had an estimated wear rate of more than 40%, or were completely repainted earlier, or had corrosion damage and damaged elements as a result of previous accidents or repairs.

TCB of a vehicle during repair removable elements of the body, cab, frame, cargo platform, etc. should be determined by the formula:

(5.54)

The coefficient of change in the value of TCF, depending on the method or nature of the proposed repair. (Some values ​​of the coefficient K1 when repairing removable parts without removing them from the vehicle are presented in Table 5.17,

– retail i-th price parts that are being repaired, rub.,

- coefficient of change in the value of the TCF depending on the degree of wear (for the values ​​​​of the coefficient K2, see the Appendix of methodological recommendations No. RD 37.009.015-98)

Number of repairable removable elements (parts), units,

Table 5.17

The coefficient of change in the value of the TCF during the repair of body elements

The value of the coefficient K1 used in each specific case is determined by the appraiser independently, based, firstly, on the actual condition of the vehicle being assessed; secondly, the expected impact of the repair impact on the appearance and residual life of repaired parts, joints, decorative and protective coatings; third, appearance repaired object of assessment as a whole. When determining the outer panels of the body, the value of K1 is recommended to be used as the maximum. In the case of minor damage (up to 5% of the area of ​​the part), the CTS for this part may not be determined. When repairing removable parts, including the body, the maximum value of the additional TCB (Uel.) cannot exceed 70% retail price these details. In turn, when repairing removable parts of its body (cabin), the total value of the additional TCB of the vehicle should not exceed the value obtained taking into account the coefficient ni specified in Table. 5.18. The appraiser has the right to charge TCB for newly damaged parts no more than 50% if the parts not affected by the accident show traces of previous accidents or repairs.

If it is necessary to determine the value of the additional TCB of the vehicle resulting from the repair of non-removable body elements that form its frame; full or partial painting or replacement of the body (cabin, frames) or their dismantling with a large amount of fitting and fitting work, the appraiser, as a rule, uses the formula:

(5.55)

The value of the CTS for one of the 3 types of repair actions ,

The coefficient of change in the value of TCF depending on the degree of wear,

The coefficient of reduction of the commodity value of the vehicle, depending on the type of the i-th repair impact, the maximum allowable values ​​of this indicator for all types of vehicles are given in Table. 5.18

- retail price of a new vehicle, taking into account the actual completeness, rub.

The value of the coefficient ni used to calculate the additional TCB when performing repairs of non-removable elements that form the body frame (Ukar.), Is determined in accordance with normative labor intensity(Tn) of the work performed, established by the manufacturer, based on ni = 0.0007 x Tn. The calculation is carried out according to the table. 5.18 subject to the restrictions Σ ni ≤ 0.15. The appraiser determines the calculation of the elimination of the skew of the load-bearing parts of the body, using the values ​​of n max, recorded in table 5.18.

Table 5.18

The coefficient of reduction in the commercial value of the vehicle, depending on the type of repair impact (reference data).

The total coefficient used to calculate the additional TCB when performing work on the repair (replacement) of fixed elements that form the body frame, and when correcting the skew of the load-bearing parts of the body, should be equal to

Corresponding to a certain type of body misalignment (value from table 5.15).

According to the requirements of methodological recommendations No. RD 37.009.015-98, in cases where there are signs of previous accidental damage to the fixed frame elements of the vehicle, the value of the additional TCB when repairing or replacing them can be reduced by 50%.

The value of the coefficient ni used in the calculation of the additional TCB when performing work on replacing the body, cab or frame, or dismantling them with a large amount of fitting and fitting work (Ukuz.), Is determined in accordance with the standard labor intensity (Tn) of the work performed, established by the factory - manufacturer, based on ni = 0.00025 x Tn

The value of the coefficient ni used to calculate the additional TCB when performing work on the complete or partial painting of the vehicle (Vokr.), Is determined in accordance with the standard labor intensity (Tn) of the work performed, established by the manufacturer, based on ni = 0.001 x Tn. The value of the additional TCB is not determined when performing painting work, if the body, cab or frame of vehicles was repainted from the outside in the area of ​​emergency damage; the value of the additional TCB is reduced by 50% if traces of previous accidents are visible on the parts of the body, cab, and platform not affected by a specific accident (TCF is not determined in this case by color variation)

The value of the coefficient ni , used to calculate the size of an additional TCB when performing work that causes a violation of the quality of the factory assembly of the vehicle and uneven colors during partial painting, are constant. In order to take into account these factors of an additional reduction in the commodity value, it is necessary to add the corresponding value, taken from Table 5.18, to the calculated value of the coefficient ni, obtained to take into account the impact of major repairs.

5. Drawing up a report on the valuation of the vehicle.

For each service performed, a set of documents is drawn up and issued to the customer, the form and content of which must comply with the requirements of the Law "On Valuation Activities", Methodological Guide No. RD 37.009.015 - 98 and the agreement on the valuation of the vehicle concluded with the customer of the service.

In the general case, the customer is issued an act of inspection of the vehicle and a report containing a conclusion on the value of the object at the time of presentation. Other documents (conclusion on the cost of restoring a damaged vehicle or calculation of repair work, conclusion on an additional TCB, and others) are drawn up and issued to the customer, depending on the purpose of the assessment. Documents on the results of the valuation, unless otherwise agreed, must be prepared and issued to the customer no later than ten days after the inspection of the vehicle.

In accordance with the requirements of No. RD 37.009.015-98, documents must be drawn up on the letterhead of the company that executed the order, which must indicate its legal address and information about the license issued to carry out appraisal activities, although in this part the Law "On Appraisal Activities" does not oblige to comply with this form, but in any case they must be signed by the contractor or the head of the expert organization and certified with a seal. Copies of the issued documents and materials of related calculations are stored in the expert organization for three years and can be issued at the official request of organizations that have the authority to do so or at the request of the customer.

Among the main requirements for the preparation of a report on the results of the assessment of the value of the vehicle, which are presented by the Law "On Appraisal Activities", the following should be highlighted.

The report should not allow ambiguous interpretation or mislead the customer about the value of the vehicle presented for evaluation.

The report must indicate the basis for the appraisal, the date of the appraisal of any type of value of the object, as well as the standards used, the goals and objectives of the appraisal; provides other information that is necessary for a complete and unambiguous interpretation of the results of the estimated value.

The report must contain a description of the object of assessment, in relation to an object owned by a legal entity - the details and book value of the object.

The report may also contain other information that, in the opinion of the appraiser, is essential for the completeness of the reflection of the method used by him to calculate the cost of a particular vehicle.

The considered methods for estimating the cost of vehicles and the practice of their application in different situations allows us to draw some generalizing conclusions about the specific features of the evaluation work in this area.

First of all, when estimating the cost of vehicles, in contrast to the valuation of other fixed assets, as a rule, one market approach is used, due to the fact that:

cost approach when evaluating the cost of a vehicle, it involves the use of the cost of the cost of its manufacture as the base calculated value. Since vehicles are objects of serial or large-scale production and the cost of their manufacture does not reflect the individual nature of the appraisal object, the cost approach is not acceptable in most cases;

income approach is based on the determination of the current value of the object of assessment as a set of future income from its operation. Based on this fact, it should be borne in mind that the income approach can only be applied to those vehicles that are used for production purposes;

market (comparative) approach is based on the analysis of the purchase and sale prices of vehicles that are currently prevailing in the primary and secondary markets. Since vehicles are mass consumption products and the number of purchase and sale transactions is quite large, price information is stable and available. In the event that the appraiser does not have information about the market price of a particular brand of vehicle, he can use the market (comparative) approach to assess the value of the object based on an analysis of the market prices of analogues. IN this case the method of direct comparison of sales is used. In addition, with the market approach, the method of specific price indicators, the method of correlation models and the method of expert assessments can be used. These methods are considered in sufficient detail when determining the cost of machinery and equipment in the previous sections of this manual.

In addition, the assessment of the cost of vehicles is clearly regulated by the “Methodological guide for determining the cost of vehicles, taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation” No. RD 37.009.015-98. This document was amended No. 1 in 1999 and No. 2 in 2000, which expanded the methodological possibilities in determining the wear of various components and assemblies, and also made it possible to adapt the developed and existing cost estimation methods to modern technical parameters of vehicles and their operating conditions. .

Let's look at a few examples of using the recommendations described above.

Example #1.

Determine the residual value of the car VAZ-2105

1. Initial data. A passenger car VAZ-2105 "Zhiguli" manufactured in 1999 was presented for inspection and determination of the cost, taking into account the costs of restoration and loss of commodity value, the mileage on the speedometer meter was 48321 km, the inspection was carried out in January 2006. with unrepaired accidental damages confirmed by the traffic police certificate and their elimination requires: replacement of the rear panel, repair number 2 of the rear right wing, replacement of the rear right lamp. Light reflectors (reflectors) 2 pcs. and the rear left lamp can be reused. There were no traces of previous accidents (repair impacts), operating defects on damaged body elements. In addition to accidental damage, the body has the following operational defects:

Damage to the paintwork of the lower front panel (dotted rash) without damaging the panel metal (defect 1);

Traces of straightening and spots of surface corrosion on the front left fender (defect 2);

Damage to the paintwork 2 scratches 25 cm long without damage to the metal of the panel on the front left door (defect 3);

Stretching of the upholstery, local tears in the seams of the pillow and the back of the left front seat (defect 4).

During operation, the following products were replaced (documented):

Tires replaced in 2004 (marking) - 4 pcs., old spare wheel with maximum allowable wear;

The battery was replaced in 2003. (marking);

The windshield was replaced in 2000 (certificate from the insurance company).

2. Calculation of the residual value of the presented car.

2.1. The retail price (Tsr) of a VAZ-2105 car at the time of presentation is 85,000 rubles.

The inspected car has a standard package, so the indicated price is taken as the estimated price (Ts′r):

2.2 To determine the percentage of vehicle wear, the following data are set:

The actual mileage (Pf) is taken according to the indicator of the distance traveled by the speedometer 48321 km., Since the speedometer is in working condition, there are no external signs of opening the device and its drive, the time for replacing the battery and tires car mileage

The actual duration of operation (Df) - 6.5 years, adopted in accordance with the data of the vehicle's technical passport

The wear indicator for mileage (I1) for the VAZ-2105 is 0.35% per 1000 km. mileage (data from No. RD 37.009.015-98):

The average annual mileage of the presented car is 7.43 thousand km. (Pf / Df), which makes it possible to take the aging index (I2) equal to 1.27% per year of operation (data from No. RD 37.009.015-98)

The percentage of wear (Wtr) of the presented VAZ-2105 car is calculated by the formula (5.44), that is:

2.3 For the upcoming calculations, we will determine the individual wear (wear percentage) of the replaced components (I1)

We take the percentage of wear of four replaced tires without calculation equal to 25%. The spare wheel tire has 100% wear (tread height less than 1.6 mm, wear indicator is visible), and has no residual value, since according to the terms of the “Operating Rules car tires» such a tire is not subject to restoration, and to ensure the safety of operation (GOST 25478-91) it is subject to mandatory replacement

The battery was installed 2 years ago and, in accordance with recommendations No. RD 37.009.015-98, have 50% wear

Windshield wear in accordance with the amendments to the methodological guide No. RD 37.009.015 - 98 is equated to the general wear of the vehicle, due to the impossibility of determining it without special equipment

2.4 Calculation of the residual value of the car by its percentage of wear in the presence of replaced (updated) components is made according to the formulas (5.45), (5.46) and (5.47)

The residual value of the car (Ciz), excluding the cost of replacements, will be:

The cost of the vehicle, taking into account the costs of the performed and necessary replacement of components (Siz.), will be:

(5.57)

The cost of carrying out the necessary replacement of components at the time of presentation of the car, rub.,

Depreciation of replaced (requiring replacement) component parts at the time of presentation of the car,%,

The number of replaced (requiring replacement) component parts, pieces.

In this case, the cost of replacing components is:

At the time of inspection:

The price of one tire (Ush) is 930 rubles.

The price of a new battery (Uakb) is 1400 rubles.

The cost of tire replacement (removal/installation of a spare wheel, installation/dismantling of a tire, wheel balancing) with standard labor input Tn = 0.88 standard hour and average cost of a standard hour 280 rubles. will be: C s / w \u003d 246 rubles.

The cost of work on replacing the battery (removal / installation, preparation and filling of electrolyte, charging) with normal labor intensity Tn = 1.1 standard hours and the average cost of a standard hour is 280 rubles. will be: Sz / acb \u003d 308 rubles

Given the above, we calculate the total costs of replaced (subject to mandatory replacement) component parts (cost of work and prices of parts):

costs for the necessary replacement of the spare wheel tire Zsh):

battery replacement cost (Zakb):

In this way,

The calculation of the cost of the car, taking into account the costs of the carried out (mandatory) replacements, does not include four tires that were replaced earlier, but reached the same wear as the car at the time of the inspection, and since they determine its completeness, they are fully taken into account in the above calculation.

2.5. Due to the presence of a number of operating defects on the car, it is necessary to adjust its cost, that is, find the approximate value of the costs (Vd.e.) for the elimination of identified defects, taking into account their division into fully or partially subjective and subtract this value from the residual value, calculated by percentage wear (PPE or, if available, PPE).

Let us give a brief description of the defects found during the inspection.

Defect 1. Spot damage to the paintwork was found without damaging the metal of the panel. They can arise for objective and subjective reasons. Therefore, it is legitimate to attribute 25% of the cost of eliminating this defect to the natural aging of the car (objective reasons). The defect is eliminated by performing exterior painting work.

Defect 2. Traces of straightening and corrosion spots were found on the panel of the front left wing. In all likelihood, they were the result of poor-quality repairs. The defect is eliminated by re-straightening and external painting work.

Defect 3. Damage to the paintwork (scratch) was detected. Since damage is a consequence of mechanical impact, this defect can be considered a subjective factor. The defect is eliminated by carrying out work on the exterior painting.

Defect 4. Stretching of the upholstery of the driver's seat with multiple tears along the seam should be partially (up to 25%) attributed to natural wear. The elimination of this defect is carried out by replacing the upholstery of the cushion and the back of the seat.

2.6 The procedure for calculating and the amount of costs for eliminating defects, taking into account the wear and tear of the vehicle and the effect of updating, are set out in Table. 5.19. The total amount of costs must be taken into account when adjusting the cost of the car, that is:

(5.59)

Table 5.19

Calculation of the cost of eliminating defects in operation (Vd.e.)

Note.

1. Labor intensity standards are adopted in accordance with the recommendations of RD 37.009.027-93.

2. The cost of work is calculated at the cost of a standard hour equal to 280 rubles.

3. Starting from defect 2, only the work necessary to eliminate the defect in question and supplementing the scope of work to eliminate defect 1 was taken into account.

The total cost of eliminating operating defects is

(2066 + 2606 + 2002 + 835) + 891 + 1190 = 9590 rubles

The cost of the car, taking into account the cost of eliminating defects in operation (Vd.e.), is:

62301 - 9590 = 52711 rubles.

2.7 The cost of the car should be further reduced, as the object is presented in a state of disrepair and requires restoration costs.

The calculation of the cost of restoration (Вв) and the amount of compensation for losses on the restoration of an emergency vehicle is carried out according to the following scheme.

The costs of performing repair and restoration work for emergency defects are determined (Table 5.20) based on the cost of one standard hour of 280 rubles.

Table 5.20

Calculation of the cost of eliminating emergency defects (Вр)

Costs for spare parts (Vd) are determined. For the presented model of the assessed car, the cost of spare parts is:

back panel - 1 pc. 650 rub.

rear right lamp assembly - 1 pc. 540 rub.

Total costs for spare parts (Vd) - 1190 rubles.

Taking into account the physical condition of the spare parts, we accept their design wear coefficient (Utr) equal to 0.75

The cost of basic materials (Vm) is determined

The initial data for the calculation in the table. 5.21.

Table. 5.21.

Calculation of the cost of basic materials (Vm.)

The total cost of restoring the presented car after the accident will be:

The cost of the car, taking into account the cost of recovery after the accident:

The amount of compensation for losses on the restoration of an emergency vehicle will be:

in its turn,

That is, 288 rubles (10733 - 10435) less than the cost of repairs, which is due to a partial renewal of the car - the installation of new parts to replace used ones.

2.8 Determining the value of additional CTS as a result of accidental damage and subsequent repair actions.

To determine the total (total) value of the additional TCB of the car, it is necessary to determine the size of the TCB for all existing operating defects, accidental damage and repair effects established during the inspection of the car. The following defects of the appraisal object were found, which affect the reduction of its commodity value:

Deformation of the back panel (replacement),

Deformation of the rear right wing (repair 2),

Traces of straightening and spots of surface corrosion on the front left fender (repair 3),

Damage to the paintwork of the lower front panel (painting),

Damage to the paintwork (2 scratches 25 cm long) of the front left door (painting).

In addition, the body structure and the technology of work when performing repair actions to eliminate the listed defects and accidental damage causes an inevitable change in the commercial and technical condition of the parts associated with the repaired parts, which must be taken into account when determining the range of defects and repair actions that affect the reduction of the overall (total) commodity value of the car.

To accurately account for the impact of each damage (defect) or repair impact on the value of the additional CCF, it is necessary to identify their belonging to the components of the total (total) CCF value (formula 5.54).

In the case under consideration, to determine the size of the additional TCB in connection with the repair (defects) of removable elements (Uel.), it is necessary to take into account repair 2 of the front left wing. The size of the additional TCB in connection with the repair (defect) of removable elements is determined by the formula:

(5.60)

From the vehicle inspection report, it was determined that one removable body element, the front left fender (m = 1), is subjected to repair. Since this damage does not apply to the accident in question (it is a consequence of the previous accident), it should be classified as an operation defect and, in accordance with the norm, TCF in the amount of not more than 50% can be charged on it, therefore, K = 0.5 * K1

When performing repair work 2, that is, eliminating damage using heating (welding or repair work 1 - parts with surface deformation from 20% to 50%), the coefficient K. takes a value of up to 0.6, hence K = 0.5 x 0.6 = 0.3

According to the price list of the car manufacturer, we accept the retail price of the front left wing Tsplk = 630 rubles.

Thus, the size of the additional TCB in connection with the repair (defects) of removable elements (Uel.), Taking into account repair 2 of the front left wing, will be:

Since (0.3 * Tsplk< 0,7 * Цплк), то полученная величина может принята в качестве размера УТС в связи с ремонтом (дефектами) съемных элементов (Уэл.).

To determine the size of the additional TCB due to defects (repair, replacement) of non-removable elements or the elimination of the distortion of the load-bearing parts of the body that form its frame, (Ukar.), It is necessary to take into account the replacement of the rear panel and the repair of 2 rear right fenders. According to formula (5.52), the size of the TCB due to defects (repair, replacement, distortion, full or partial painting) of non-removable body elements will be equal to:

(5.61)

From the act of inspection of the car and costing for the restoration of the operational and consumer properties of the car, it was determined that two non-removable elements of the body are subjected to repair - the rear panel and the rear right wing. Since there are traces of previous accident damage and repair impacts on the car, and in accordance with the norm, TCB in the amount of not more than 50% can be charged on it. When performing work on car repair, the coefficient of change in the value of the TCF depending on the degree of wear of the car (K2) is taken according to the Methodological Guide No. RD 37.009.015-98. When calculating the percentage of vehicle wear, Utr = 24.7%, the coefficient K2 is 0.4, that is, K2 = 0.4.

The coefficient of reduction in commodity value depending on the type of repair impact ni used to calculate the size of an additional TCB when performing work on the repair (replacement) of fixed elements that form the body frame (platforms, frames, carriages) or to eliminate the skew of the bearing parts (Ukar.), is determined in accordance with the standard labor intensity (Tn) of the work performed, established by the vehicle manufacturer, based on ni = 0.0007 * Tn.

The normative labor intensity (Tn1) for replacing the rear panel of a VAZ-2105 car according to No. RD 37.009 - 92 is 5.15 standard hours. The normative labor intensity (Tn2) of repairing 2 rear right wing of a VAZ 2105 car according to No. RD 37.009 - 92 is 3.95 standard hours. Consequently,

To take into account the additional reduction in commodity value when performing work that causes a violation of the quality of the factory assembly of the vehicle, such as, for example, replacing the rear panel, repairing the rear right fender, repairing the front left fender, it is necessary to calculate the coefficient n1 obtained to take into account the impact of major repairs add a constant coefficient adopted according to table 5.18 (clause 8), taking into account the violation of the quality of the factory assembly (nb. = 0.01). From here

The retail price of a new car, taking into account the build (Tsr), as you know, is determined in the amount of 85,000 rubles.

Thus, the size of the additional TCB due to defects (repair, replacement, skew) of non-removable elements (Ukar), taking into account the repair actions performed on the rear panel and the rear right wing, will be:

Due to the presence on the car of traces of previous accidental damage and repair impacts, in accordance with the norm, the TCB is charged in the amount of 50%, that is

Performing repair actions related to the replacement of the car body or its disassembly with a large amount of fitting and fitting work, Ukuz. in the case under consideration is not required, that is, Ukuz. = 0

In accordance with the norms of the Methodological Guide No. RD 37.009.015-98, the TCF value due to the repair painting (Uokr.) for vehicles with a service life of more than 5 years is not performed, but for the completeness of the considered example of determining the total (total) value of the TCF, such a calculation given below as for a vehicle less than 5 years old.

To determine the size of an additional TCB in connection with the implementation of a full or partial painting of the body (body parts), Wokr. it is necessary to take into account the following defects, Repair impacts and changes in the commercial and technical condition of parts associated with the repaired:

Damage to the paintwork of the lower front panel,

Damage to the paintwork of the front left door,

Rear panel replacement work

Repair 2 rear right fender,

Repair 2 front left fender, rear left fender painting.

From the act of inspection of the car and the calculation of costs for the restoration of the operational and consumer properties of the car, the technological necessity of applying a repair paintwork (exterior painting) to the lower front panel, left front fender, rear right fender, rear left fender, front panel, front left door was determined. In accordance with the norm, if there are traces of previous accidents (repair painting, corrosion) on the parts not affected by the accident in question, the value of the additional TCB is reduced by 50%. UTS is not determined by the tone difference.

The size of the additional TCB due to defects (full or partial painting) of individual elements of the car (or the body as a whole) will be determined by the formula:

(5.62)

When performing work on car repair, the coefficient of change in the value of the CCF depending on the degree of wear of the object (K2) is taken according to the Methodological Guide No. RD 37.009.015-98. With the estimated percentage of vehicle wear equal to Utr = 24.7%, the coefficient K2 is 0.4.

The coefficient of reduction in commodity value depending on the type of repair impact ni used to calculate the size of the additional TCB when performing work on the full or partial painting of the vehicle (Vokr.), Is determined in accordance with the standard labor intensity (Tn) of the work performed, established by the vehicle manufacturer based on ni = 0.001 x Tn. Normative labor intensity (Tn) is taken according to No. RD 37.009.027-92 for the VAZ-2105 car. (The values ​​of Tn and ni for a specific situation are presented in Table 5.22).

Table 5.22.

Initial data for calculating the coefficient of reduction in commodity value.

The retail price (Tsr) of a new car, taking into account the configuration, is 85,000 rubles. The size of the additional TCB in connection with the performance of full or partial painting of the body (body parts) (Wokr) is determined by the formula:

In accordance with the norm, if there are traces of previous accidents (repair painting, corrosion) on the parts not affected by the accident in question, the value of the additional TCB is reduced by 50%, TCB is not determined by color variation. In this way

The total (total) value of the additional vehicle TCB as a result of accidental damage and subsequent repair actions is determined by the formula (5.53):

5. The residual value of the VAZ-2105 car, taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation, is:

(forty-one thousand one hundred nineteen rubles).

Example #2.

Prepare a vehicle inspection report.

Presented for inspection car GAZ 3110 "Volga"

Inspection time 10 hours 00 minutes

Place of inspection - parking at the place of residence.

By me, an expert engineer, Ivanov A.I. inspection of the car GAZ 3110 "Volga" made in Russia. Car manufactured in 1997, state license plate A 777 ТН 78, engine number V0034550, body number V2266571, identification number (VIN) 311000V2266571, body color blue, mileage 45,000 km. , technical passport (certificate of registration) series AM number 133465. The car belongs to Kozlov Vasily Andreevich on the property rights, residing at St. Petersburg, st. Koroleva, d. 1, bldg. 1, apt. 10.

On examination it was found: The car is serial, standard configuration, without power steering. There is no additional equipment. The date of the first sale of the car is February 04, 1997. The car was operated in road and climatic conditions of the North-West region of Russia (2nd category of operation). The nature of operation is seasonal. The engine number, color and body number, identification number and state registration number placed on the vehicle in question correspond to the entries in the vehicle passport and the traffic police certificate on a traffic accident (RTA), the nature and list of damage to the car corresponds to the entries in the traffic police certificate on an accident. Damage to the car does not prevent the inspection of the operation of units, assemblies and systems. The second participant in the accident Smirnov D.D. invited by the owner of the car to participate in the inspection 25.01. 2007 at 10:00 am (notification of the delivery of telegram No. 324 dated April 21, 2006

The vehicle has the following operational defects: operational defects on the inspected vehicle were not found.

The vehicle sustained the following damage as a result of the accident.

The hood in the right front part is deformed by 35% of the surface area with a geometry violation.

The geometry of the hood opening is broken.

Deformed over the entire surface area with the formation of sharp folds, metal hood and violation of the geometry of the front right fender.

The mudguard of the radiator lining, the upper panel of the radiator lining, the right radiator shield, the casing of the right headlight, the right amplifier of the radiator lining frame, the right bracket of the amplifier, the mudguard of the right front wing are deformed.

Deformed in front of the spar of the over-engine right frame.

The front right door is deformed in the front part, where the outer and inner door panels are mated (a slight metal hood is observed).

The front plastic bumper, the bracket of the front right and left bumpers, the linkage of the steering trapezium bipod, the right headlight, the right front turn signal, the plastic expansion tank, and the radiator lining were damaged.

During the inspection were present:

Signature

Signature

Vehicle owner ______________ Signature

Expert opinion: The car is out of order, has lost its presentation, consumer and operational qualities. To bring the car in line with the requirements of the Rules traffic RF, State Standard GOST 25478-91 “Vehicles. Requirements for the technical condition in terms of traffic safety. Test methods”, it is necessary to perform the following work to restore the consumer and operational qualities of the car:

Hood opening - eliminate skew (simple skew),

Front right fender - replacement,

Mudguard grille - replacement,

Upper radiator grille panel - replacement,

Right radiator shield - replacement,

Right headlight housing - replacement,

Radiator trim frame right reinforcement - replacement,

Right amplifier bracket - replacement,

Mudguard right front fender - replacement,

Front bumper (plastic) - replacement,

Right and left front bumper brackets - replacement,

Trapeze bipod linkage - replacement,

Right block headlight - replacement,

Right front turn signal - replacement,

Expansion tank (plastic) - replacement,

Radiator cover - replacement,

The side member of the sub-engine frame is right - repair No. 3,

Right front door - repair No. 2,

Hood - repair No. 2.

The nature of the damage suggests that there may be hidden defects in the front suspension, cooling system, and lubrication system.

The vehicle was inspected in accordance with the requirements of No. RD 37.009.015-98 “Methodological Guidelines for determining the cost of a vehicle, taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation” No. RD 37.009.024.92 “Acceptance, repair and release from repair of bodies cars auto maintenance enterprises”, “Judicial autotechnical expertise. Part 2. Theoretical basis and methods of expert research in the production of cars technical expertise. A manual for experts - auto technicians, investigators and judges.

The nomenclature of requirements for the technical condition of the vehicle, the norms of parameters and the list of works are adopted in accordance with the State Standard GOST 25478-91 “Vehicles. Requirements for the technical condition in terms of traffic safety. Verification Methods”; RD 37.009.026-92 "Regulations on the maintenance and repair of vehicles owned by citizens (trucks and cars, buses and minitractors"; regulatory, technological and pricing documents: a collection of labor input standards for pre-sale preparation, maintenance and repair of passenger cars manufactured by GAZ and a collection of prices for spare parts for GAZ cars, issue 11, 1999.

The act was drawn up on the basis of an external examination.

Expert engineer Ivanov A.I. (signature)

Example #3

Determine the value of the loss of commodity value (TCS) of the vehicle as a result of damage and subsequent repair impacts and prepare an appropriate conclusion.

Presented car GAZ 3110 "Volga" made in Russia. Year of manufacture 1997, state license plate A 777 HA 78, engine number V0034550, body number V2266571, identification number (WIN) 311000V2266571, body color blue, mileage 45,000 km, technical passport (registration certificate) series AM number 133465. The car belongs to Kozlov Vasily Andreevich on the rights of ownership, residing at St. Petersburg, st. Koroleva, d. 1, bldg. 1, apt. 10

The conclusion was prepared on the basis of the vehicle inspection certificate No. ... dated January 25, 2007. and certificates of traffic police No. 126 dated January 17, 2007.

In preparing the conclusion, the following were used:

"Methodological guide for determining the cost of vehicles, taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation" No. RD 37.009.015-98.

Collection of prices for spare parts for GAZ passenger cars, issue 11.1999.

Collection of standards of labor intensity for pre-sale preparation, Maintenance and repair of passenger cars manufactured by GAZ.

Additional data required to prepare the conclusion:

The retail price of the car Tsr = 105540 rubles.

Car wear rate is 15.7%.

The coefficient of change in the value of TCF depending on the degree of wear of parts. For our particular case, K2 = 0.58 (see the Appendix of the Methodological Guide No. RD 37. 009.015-98).

Determination of the loss of commodity value (UTS) of the presented car.

1. Determining the size of the TCB in connection with the repair of removable body elements that form the frame is made on the basis of the data in Table. 5.20 and is calculated using the formula:

(5.63)

Table 5.23

Data for calculating the size of the TCB in connection with the repair of removable body elements

When calculating the TCF of removable parts, it must be borne in mind that there is a restriction according to which the TCF of a removable part cannot be more than 0.7 of the retail price of the part. In this case, this limitation is not reached and therefore in the table. 5.20 the last column is blank.

2. The size of the TCB in connection with the repair or replacement of the load-bearing parts of the body that form the frame (Ukar.), We determine using the data in Table. 5.20 and the formula:

(5.64)

- the coefficient of change in the value of the TCF, depending on the degree of wear of non-removable body parts,

- part price

- the overall reduction coefficient of the TCB for the work performed related to the repair of non-removable body parts

When calculating the TCF from the repair (replacement) of non-removable body elements, there is a limit on the value of the total coefficient n vol., which cannot exceed the value of 0.15. In this case, this limit is not reached.

Skewed body frame also reduces the commodity value of the object. To calculate the magnitude of the reduction, we use the data in Table. 5.24.

Table 5.24

Initial data for calculation

When the distortion is eliminated, n = n max, and therefore the TCF in connection with the repair or replacement of the load-bearing parts of the body that form the frame, and the elimination of distortions, is determined as follows:

3. Determine the size of the TCB due to the repair painting, using the data in Table. 5.25 and formula 5.64:

Table 5.25

Initial data for calculation.

To take into account the difference in tone with partial body painting in accordance with clause 5.10 methodological recommendations No. RD 37.009.015-98 it is necessary to add a constant coefficient of 0.005 to the total coefficient nob:

4. We determine the size of the TCB due to the large amount of fitting and fitting work.

The labor intensity of disassembly-assembly according to the conclusion on the cost of repairs is 26.95 standard hours. Based on these data:

To take into account the violation of the quality of the factory assembly in accordance with paragraph 5.10. Methodological guide No. RD 37.009.015-98, it is necessary to add the value 0.01 to the coefficient n:

The total loss of the commodity value of the car is:

(four thousand four hundred five rubles thirty one kopeck).

GOLF identification number (VIN) WVWTTT1JZ1W241712 (or registration plate H 789 OT 29)

Arkhangelsk

1. MAIN FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Object of assessment: VOLKSWAGEN GOLF identification number (VIN) WVWTTT1JZ1W241712 (or registration plate H 789 OT 29)

Appraised car VOLKSWAGENGOLF. The assessment of components, assemblies and equipment with a residual resource, and the costs of its dismantling, was carried out on the basis of the Vehicle Inspection Certificates dated 01/01/2001, 01/01/2001, and a photo of the vehicle. For further evaluation, the following assumption was made: since the vehicle was in a technically sound condition suitable for operation before it was damaged, all undamaged components, assemblies and equipment are considered suitable for further sale. For further implementation, only undamaged units, assemblies and equipment that are in demand on the market are used.

Conclusion: Taking into account rounding, the cost of disposal residues costly approach amounted to

RUB 144,290

(One hundred forty-four thousand two hundred ninety rubles).

TASK FOR ASSESSMENT

Grounds for the appraiser to evaluate the object of appraisal

2. INFORMATION ABOUT THE EVALUATION CUSTOMER AND THE APPRAISER

3. ASSUMPTIONS AND RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS USED BY THE VALUER IN THE VALUATION

This opinion is reliable only in its entirety and can only be used in accordance with the purposes of the assessment; individual parts of the Report cannot be independent documents.

The Customer did not provide data, and the Appraiser did not identify any encumbrances regarding the appraisal object. Calculations were made based on the assumption that there are no encumbrances on the assessed object.

The Appraiser's opinion on value is valid as of the date of the appraisal. The Appraiser accepts no responsibility for social, economic, physical or regulatory changes that may occur after this date and affect the subject property and thus affect its value.

4. APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT STANDARDS

Laws and standards used

Determination of the utilization value of the appraisal object was carried out in accordance with the current normative documents: Civil Code RF, federal law dated 01.01.2001 No. 135-FZ “On appraisal activities in the Russian Federation”.

When carrying out valuation activities, the Appraiser applied the Federal Valuation Standards (FSO) valid on the date of valuation: FSO No. 1, approved by order of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia No. 000 dated 01.01.2001, FSO No. 2, approved by order of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia dated 01.01.2001 No. 255 , FSO No. 3, approved by order of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia dated 01.01.2001 No. 000.

The appraisal complied with the requirements of the Self-Regulatory Organization of Appraisers, the existing principles and methods of appraisal.

The assessment was carried out taking into account the requirements of the Federal Law "On Compulsory Insurance of Civil Liability of Vehicle Owners" dated 01.01.01 and Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 01.01.01 No. 000 "On the Organization of an Independent Technical Expertise of Vehicles".

The assessment was carried out taking into account the requirements of the guidelines and methodological documents for the assessment of vehicles.

Applicable concepts and definitions

The object of evaluation is the objects of civil rights, in respect of which the legislation of the Russian Federation establishes the possibility of their participation in civil circulation.

Date of appraisal (date of appraisal, date of determination of value) - the date as of which the value of the object of appraisal is determined.

Market value is the most probable price at which the subject property can be sold for open market in a competitive environment, when the parties to the transaction act reasonably, having all the necessary information, and any extraordinary circumstances are not reflected in the value of the transaction price.

List of sources of information used in the assessment

Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

Federal Law "On valuation activities in the Russian Federation" dated 01.01.2001 No. 135-FZ.

Federal Law "On Compulsory Insurance of Civil Liability of Vehicle Owners" dated 01.01.01

Federal valuation standard No. 1 approved by order of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia dated 01.01.2001 No. 000;

Federal valuation standard No. 2 approved by order of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia dated 01.01.2001 No. 000;

Federal valuation standard No. 3 approved by order of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia dated 01.01.2001 No. 000;

Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 01.01.01 No. 000 "On the organization of an independent technical examination of vehicles"

Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2003 No. 000 "Rules for compulsory insurance of civil liability of vehicle owners"

Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 01.01.01 No. 000 “On Amendments to the Rules for Compulsory Insurance of Civil Liability of Vehicle Owners, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2003 No. 000”

Appraisal of motor vehicles. M., Delo Publishing House, 2002

Assessment of the amount of damage in case of damage to cars VAZ 2108, 2109, 21099, 2115. M., Education Publishing House, 2005

RD 37.009.015 - 98. Guidelines for determining the cost of vehicles, taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation (as amended No. 1,) (Approved by the Ministry of Economy of the Russian Federation in 1998) M., NAMI, 1999

Methodological guide for forensic experts "Investigation of motor vehicles in order to determine the cost of refurbishment and valuation." Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Russian Federal Center for SE, North-West Center for SE. M., 2008

RD 37.009.015 - 98. Guidelines for determining the cost of vehicles, taking into account natural wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation (as amended No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6). M., PRICE-N, 2006

The cost of imported and domestic used cars. www. ***** www. *****

Prices for vehicles, tractors, automobile and tractor engines, motorcycles, cranes, lift trucks. www. ***** www. *****

The cost of standard hours by type of repair work, marketing research in the Arkhangelsk region.

Internet resources on the subject of evaluation.

5. DESCRIPTION OF THE OBJECT OF ASSESSMENT

Documents establishing the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the object of assessment

Vehicle inspection certificates “dated 01/01/2001, and 11/24/2010, as well as a photo of the vehicle.

Characteristics of the object of assessment

Tab. 6.1 Characteristics of the damaged vehicle

6. information on the region about the OBJECT OF ASSESSMENT

There is no market for emergency ATEs in the Arkhangelsk region, since all emergency ATEs are sold on the black market and the cost of such ATEs is not advertised anywhere.

The cost of 1 standard hour of repair work, the value of which in the Arkhangelsk region is.

The cost of good leftovers can also be determined for a specific part according to the price list of one of the stores or, for example, http://*****/.

7. SELECTION AND RATIONALE FOR ASSESSMENT APPROACHES

The cost of usable balances of AMTS is calculated using two approaches:

Comparative approach by determining the cost of ATE in the emergency ATE market. There is no market for emergency ATEs in the Arkhangelsk region, since all emergency ATEs are sold on the black market and the cost of such ATEs is not advertised anywhere.

The cost approach, as the total cost of serviceable parts, components and assemblies of an emergency ATE, suitable for further sale (hereinafter referred to as suitable spare parts) and the disposal cost of parts and assemblies unsuitable for sale (utilization residues), minus the costs of disassembling the ATE, troubleshooting and selling spare parts, as well as the disposal of unsold balances of AMTS.

The income approach is not applied, since in this case no income from the appraised object is expected.

Conclusion: When determining the market value of emergency ATEs that cannot be restored, the cost approach is applied.

8. DETERMINATION OF RECYCLING COST

Cost approach

Determination of the cost of emergency ATEs sold as separate parts and disposal residues.

An emergency AMTS, in which there are still functional units, components, parts, can be disassembled and, after troubleshooting, everything suitable for further use in the used spare parts market can be sold. In this case, the cost of suitable residues can be determined by the formula:

Sl \u003d Slz + Su - Zp - Zt - Zu, rub., Where:

Cl - the cost of good residues, rub.;

Slz - st-th workable parts on the used market

Spare parts or new ones, taking into account the wear and tear of the vehicle, rub.;

Su - the cost of disposal residues, rub.;

Zp - pre-sale costs (transportation, disassembly,

Troubleshooting, etc.), rub.;

Зт - trading costs, rub.;

Zu - costs associated with the disposal of AMTS, rub.

The cost of suitable spare parts, disposal residues, pre-sale costs, trading costs, costs associated with the disposal of AMTS are determined based on the market prices prevailing in the region using a comparative approach.

If it is impossible to sell suitable spare parts or if there is no economic feasibility, the cost of disposal residues is taken into account in their sale.

Details suitable for sale and further use (based on inspection certificates ", as well as a photo of the vehicle.

For work on the removal of equipment, a time norm was used equal to 30% of the time norm for the removal / installation of equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's standards.

Calculation of the cost of parts fit for sale, the cost of parts is taken from the online store Exist http://www. *****/.

Wear calculation

Type of transport - Passenger;

Time period (D) - 10.8 (eleven years);

Total mileage (P.6 (thousand km.);

The average wear rate per 1000 km of run is 0.3%;

Average aging index for 1 year of operation (I2) - 1.15%;

Ie \u003d I1 x P + I2 x D \u003d 0.3 x 161.6 + 1.15 x 10.8 \u003d 60.9%

Operational wear (Ie) - 60.9%.

Due to the insignificant amount of non-ferrous metals present in the estimated vehicle, for further calculation of their cost, we neglect.

Weight of vehicle residues (after dismantling of equipment intended for sale) - 1.5 tons. Contamination with non-metallic impurities (tires, seats, glass, upholstery, etc.) - 10%

The net weight of scrap metal of the remains of the estimated vehicle will be: 1.35 tons.

The retail price for the acceptance of scrap metal of the 5AP type (machines, complete machine) is 2,000 rubles as of the assessment date. per 1 ton (Vtormet, Arkhangelsk).

The cost of scrap metal of vehicle parts will be: 1.35 * 2,000 = 2,700 rubles.

The cost of transporting and loading scrap metal of vehicle parts will be (when renting a car and a crane for one hour) - 1,500 rubles.

The salvage value of the appraised object will be:

145,393.45 + 2,700 - 2,500 = 144,289.45 rubles.

Conclusion: The cost of disposal residues using the cost approach amounted to 144,289 rubles 45 kopecks (One hundred and forty-four thousand two hundred and eighty-nine rubles 45 kopecks).

9. CONSOLIDATION OF RESULTS

As a result of the calculations, the value of the appraised object was:

Conclusion: Taking into account rounding, the cost of disposal residues using the cost approach amounted to 144,290 rubles (One hundred and forty-four thousand two hundred and ninety rubles).

Appraiser ______________________/ /

CEO ______________________/ /

Mandatory Annexes to the report

1. Documents establishing the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the object of assessment.

AGREEMENT N ___ ON ASSESSMENT OF THE VEHICLE ______________________________ "__" ___________ ____ (name of the settlement) __________________________________________________________________ (name of the legal entity or individual _________________________________________________________________, entrepreneur) hereinafter referred to as the "Appraiser", represented by _________________________ _________________________________________________________________ (position, surname, name, patronymic) head _________________________________________________________________, legal entity) acting on the basis of the charter of the organization (documents confirming the state registration of an individual entrepreneur), on the one hand, and _____________________________ __________________________________________________________________ (legal entity or individual) hereinafter referred to as the "Customer", acting on the basis of ______ ___________________________________ ______________________________, on the other hand, have entered into this agreement as follows. 1. Subject of the contract 1.1. The Customer instructs, and the Appraiser assumes the obligation to evaluate the vehicle: Type ______________________________________________________________ Brand, model __________________________________________________________ Category (ABCD, trailer) __________ Registration N ____________ Identification number (VIN): ___________________________________ Engine: model ____________________ N _________________________ Chassis (frame) N ________________ Body (sidecar) N ________________ Color: _________________________ Date of issue _____________________ Passport of the vehicle: series ____________ N _____________ Vehicle owner __________________________________ Owner's address __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 1.2. The purpose of the assessment _________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ 1.3. The date on which the cost of the vehicle is determined (date of appraisal) ___________________________________________ 1.4. Place of evaluation ________________________________________________ 1.5. Grounds for concluding the contract ___________________________ 2. Rights and obligations of the Customer 2.1. The customer has the right: 2.1.1. Receive from the Appraiser all the necessary information about the used assessment standard, methodological and informational support for the work on the assessment of the vehicle. 2.1.2. Get acquainted with the intermediate and preliminary results of the work on the assessment of the vehicle. 2.2. The customer assumes the following responsibilities: 2.2.1. Provide the Appraiser with a vehicle passport, a vehicle registration certificate, a document confirming the right to own (dispose, use) the vehicle, data on the book value of the vehicle (for legal entities). 2.2.2. Provide the Appraiser, at his request, free of charge and in a timely manner, with all the information he has, including documented information, which may be relevant for the assessment of the vehicle (document on temporary deregistration or final withdrawal from service, certificates of previous accidents, as well as information on hidden defects, actual mileage deviating from speedometer data, previous vehicle evaluations, etc.). 2.2.3. Pay for the work of the Appraiser in accordance with the terms of this agreement. 3. Rights and obligations of the Appraiser 3.1. The appraiser has the right: 3.1.1. Apply independently the methods of valuation of vehicles in accordance with the valuation standards and current methods. 3.1.2. Require the Customer, when conducting a mandatory assessment of the vehicle, to provide access in full to the documentation necessary for the implementation of this assessment. 3.1.3. Receive from the Customer clarifications and additional information necessary for the evaluation of the vehicle. 3.1.4. Involve other appraisers or appraisers on a contractual basis to participate in the assessment of the vehicle. 3.2. The appraiser assumes the following responsibilities: 3.2.1. Carry out an assessment of the vehicle in accordance with the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation, assessment standards, current regulatory and methodological documentation. 3.2.2. Prepare a vehicle appraisal report. To ensure the independence, objectivity and credibility of the evaluation results when compiling the report. Indicate the following information about yourself in the assessment report: 3.2.2.1. On civil liability insurance, indicating the serial number of the insurance policy, the full name of the insurance company, postal and legal address, telephones, faxes and other means of communication, bank and tax details, the amount insured, the term of insurance, the territory of insurance and the conditions of insurance. 3.2.2.2. On the availability of documents confirming the acquisition of professional knowledge in the field of vehicle valuation by the valuation experts. 3.2.2.3. On the availability of a certificate indicating the number and date of issue of the certificate, types of certified services, the certification body that issued the specified certificate, the validity period of the certificate (when providing a certified service). 3.2.2.4. On membership in a self-regulatory organization (a professional public association of appraisers or a non-profit organization of appraisers). 3.2.2.5. On the issued license for the assessment of vehicles (in the event that, as of the date of preparation of the report, the legislation of the Russian Federation introduced licensing of assessment activities and established the procedure for its licensing). 3.2.3. Submit the report to the Customer in one copy within a period not exceeding _____ calendar days from the date of making an advance payment under the contract. 3.2.4. Ensure the safety of documents received from the Customer and third parties in the course of the assessment work. 3.2.5. Keep copies of the evaluation report for three years. 3.2.6. Provide the Customer with information on the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation on valuation activities, on the charter and code of ethics of the relevant self-regulatory organization, membership in which the Appraiser refers to in his report. 3.2.7. Do not disclose confidential information received from the Customer during the assessment of the vehicle, except as otherwise provided by the legislation of the Russian Federation. 3.2.8. Inform the Customer about the impossibility of his participation in the assessment of the vehicle due to the occurrence of circumstances that prevent an objective assessment of the vehicle. 4. Additional terms 4.1. In the case of carrying out work on the assessment of a vehicle with an instrumental check of the technical condition and (and) with a check functional characteristics vehicle on the move (in road conditions), the responsibility for damage to the vehicle lies with the person driving the vehicle. 4.2. The customer has the right to free elimination of identified deficiencies. If the shortcomings are not eliminated within the specified period, or they cannot be eliminated within the specified period, or the elimination itself turns out to be impossible, the Customer may demand termination of the contract or a reduction in the price for the assessment. 4.3. In case of violation of his rights as a consumer of vehicle appraisal services, the Customer may apply: - to the appraiser's civil liability insurer; - to the certification body that issued the certificate for the services provided (if the services are certified); - to a self-regulatory organization, if the Appraiser is a member of the said organization; - to the licensing authority (in the event that, as of the date of the report, the legislation of the Russian Federation introduced licensing of valuation activities and established the procedure for its licensing). In case of disagreement with the results of the vehicle valuation, the Customer must notify the Appraiser in writing and return the valuation report to him. 4.4. Preliminary or any other communication by the Appraiser of the intermediate results of the vehicle valuation has no legal force and does not entitle the Customer to refer to them officially. 4.5. Provision of services to the Customer for the maintenance and protection of the vehicle valuation report in the courts of general jurisdiction, arbitration courts, in the notaries, public authorities and administrations, as well as in other organizations, is carried out by the Appraiser on the basis of an additional agreement to this agreement. 4.6. Disputes under this agreement are resolved in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. 5. Cost of works, terms and order of payments 5.1. The total cost of work under this contract is _______________________________________ rubles. 5.2. The customer after the conclusion of the contract makes an advance payment in the amount of ____________________________ rubles. 5.3. If the appraisal report is not requested by the Customer within 10 working days after the deadline for submitting the specified report by the Appraiser, as set out in clause 3.2.3, the amount of the advance payment is counted as payment for the work performed. 6. Liability of the parties 6.1. The appraiser is responsible in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. 6.2. In case of non-compliance with the terms of clause 3.2.3 of this agreement, the Appraiser pays a fine in the amount of 0.5% of the contract price for each day of delay. 7. Validity period of the agreement, terms of its modification and termination 7.1. Validity period: start ___________ end _____________ 7.2. Changes to the contract are made by agreement of the parties. 7.3. The Agreement may be terminated at the initiative of the Appraiser if it is impossible for him to participate in the assessment of the vehicle due to the occurrence of circumstances that prevent an objective assessment of the vehicle. 8. Legal and payment details of the parties 8.1. Customer: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 8.2. Appraiser: ________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Applications: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Appraiser _________________ Customer ___________________